Re: Future of Euphoria
- Posted by Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru> May 27, 2002
- 575 views
Hi again Dan, ---------- > Îò: dm31 at uow.edu.au > Êîìó: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com> > Òåìà: Re: Future of Euphoria > Äàòà: ïîíåäåëüíèê, Ìàé 27, 2002 15:56 > True, but Completed Projects are full projects that > have been marketed and sold, hence have made people > real money. Active Projects are projects that are > currently being developped. Also, I was a beta > member, and this company has only truly being > going for about 2 years. OK, but C language is 30 years old, I can not ever imagine how many C programmers just do not want to learn *any* new word. And I can not imagine how many C teachers just do not want to teach *any* new word. So Euphoria competes hardly and wins. > You must a agree that 21 projects completed > AND in MASS production is a decent feat, No? I do not know what are these 21 projects *inside*, how many new things they include, maybe just delays for the new CPUs. Who knows? But you can see full source code of Eu projects on RDS site. > This isn't a programming community like EuCom > but is a place for you to make and develop software > in whatever langauge you like. > It is quite impressive in side. What a problem? Try Euphoria there in a new cool project > Regard's > Dan > > ps Hope this makes sense because it's late, > and I'm frustrated with having to use strings > in my c++ assignment when I could be using > those great sequences ;) OK. Good luck just tomorrow and forever ! Regards, Igor Kachan kinz at peterlink.ru > >> Sorry, I forgot to ask. Did anyone look > >> at www.asynchrony.com > > >> Dan > > > > >Yes, I did. > > > >The interesting enough thing: > > > >Current Site Statistics > > (asynchrony) RapidEuphoria site > > > >Members: 30,310 315 (known software authors) > >Projects: 1,649 948 (all contributed Eu software) > >Active projects 1,238 112 (just contrib page) > >Completed Projects 21 836 (just archive pages) > >Open Job Postings 1,675 --- > > > >Do you see the ratio "completed projects" / "members" > >on asynchrony and on euphoria? > > > >asynchrony 21/30,310 = 0,0007 > >euphoria 836/315 = 2,6539 > > > >euphoria / asynchrony = 2,6539 / 0,0007 = 3791 > > > >Our Euphoria, it seems to be, is much more productive > >community than Asynchrony community is. > > > >Almost 4000/1, no? > > > >Regards, > >Igor Kachan > >kinz at peterlink.ru