OpenEuphoria

Re: Hello!

• Posted by pampeano at rocketmail.com May 15, 2002
• 411 views

Hi Alexa,
  Welcome to our community =)
  I hope i can help with my answer if i don't, i'm sure someone else
can.
  1) Enter http://www.rapideuphoria.com/contrib.htm and search for EFL.
It's a modification to euphoria's editor so it can support foreign
languages. You can tweak it to fill your need =)
  2) Not sure about that, i just simply call it "euphoric magic".

Hope this helps.

Best Regards,
    Guillermo Bonvehi
    AKA: KNiXEUR - Caballero Rojo

--- alexione at EUnet.yu wrote:
> 
> Hello, funs of eu from another ex-Pascaller :)
> 
> Few words on me - I'm student of computer-science especially
> interested in PLs. I 
> really like eu, it's simplicity and readability, and here are some
> questions I have:
> 
> 1) Did anybody already write some kind of preprocessor for eu which
> supports 
> shortcuts for keywords (like proc->procedure, func->function, endp,
> endf, endw, 
> endfor, endif, ...)? I have to admit that I have most trouble typing
> that 'SEQuence' 
> which annoyed me so much that I replaced it with type 'list' = return
> 1. Or, maybe ED 
> or EE or some other editor supports these features?
> 
> 2) Those upper and lower from wildcards.e are real example of eu's
> power. Doing a 
> little test with seq of 2 millions integers, I find that those
> functions sometimes work 
> faster (about 1.2s), and sometimes slower (about 1.4s). But when I
> write it as:
> 
> function is_upper (object x)
>     return (x >= 'A' and x <= 'Z')
> end function
> 
> global function lower(object x)
>     return x + is_upper(x) * TO_LOWER
> end function
> 
> it constantly works faster (1.2s). I suppose it has some connection
> with freeing of 
> not-anymore-used seqs, or smt like that, which seems to be done at
> the and of 
> func/proc (just thoughts). I have no real question here, it was just
> an observation 
> hoping it could help improving eu's handling of seqs.
> 
> That's it for now.
> 
> Best regards
> Alexa
>