Re: win32lib event handling question
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at gmail.com> Jul 20, 2005
- 495 views
Derek Parnell wrote: > > > posted by: Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> > > ags wrote: > >>Argh. Unpost. >> >>routine_id("child_onMouse") evidently would be -1 if child_onMouse() >>is not declared yet. >> >>(decides to attack Rob instead) >>(reads archived posts) >>(decides against it :) >> >>Anyway, of course moving the procedure declaration above the routine_id >>examining it works very well. > > > Welcome to my nightmare > Yes, let's repeat again: routine_id() is already a way to get around the normal calling mechanism and should allow forward referencing. Lather, rinse, repeat. -- ============================== Too many freaks, not enough circuses. j.