OpenEuphoria

Re: Euphoria Features

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com> Jul 14, 2005
• 447 views

Euman wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> my $0.04
> 
> As a Linux user (Fedora Core X sponsored by RedHat) Euphoria is 
> an unacceptable tool for widespread use. The very fact that eu
> isnt opensourced puts Euphoria on the very back burner.
> 
> Everyone seems to want certain enhancments that RDS is reluctant
> to persue so as to not break any previously written material.
> I can see the reasons why they are reluctant however, I suggest
> a version of euphoria that can be made opensourced so the 1000's
> of Linux programmers can extend and vote on feature that would
> make euphoria a better choice over perl or python for the many 
> scritps that are needed to run a safe, secure, powerful and stable
> O/S. Surely there has to be benefits to RDS for the hard work already
> placed on Euphoria. 
> 
> These should be the ideas we need to look at.
> 
> (just my personal opinion)
> 
> Euman
> 
> 

The Euphoria interpreter source in Euphoria is better than open source, it is
public domain.  That means that RDS has given up all rights to it.

Of course someone would have to re-implement it in a different language, but...


=====================================
Too many freaks, not enough circuses.

j.