Re: Question About Web Site Speed
cklester wrote:
>
> Using the Apache server, how would the speed of a web site served up by
> Euphoria compare with one served up by PHP?
>
> Considerations:
>
> + PHP is "built-in" to the Apache server (or "better" integrated than what
> is available for Euphoria); how significant is this an advantage?
> + Euphoria is faster than PHP in performance; true to what extent?
> + How many users could each accommodate at a time? in a minute?
> + ...?
>
> I'm asking because I'm considering using Euphoria for a commercial site. If
> not Euphoria, it will probably be PHP.
>
> -=ck
> "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> <a
> href="http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/">http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/</a>
My friend and I are actually using Euphoria for a (hopefully) commercial
project. We've found that there's not that much difference unless you're
embedding the PHP in a webpage then there is an advantage. Other than that we
haven't seen that much difference however we're not doing any strenuous
computation nor have we fully measured PHP verus Euphoria (we're just going by
what it seemed like). However, we have measured that CGI with Euphoria is
typically faster than CGI in Perl for most tasks and if you translate and compile
it it's even better.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
