OpenEuphoria

Re: binded wxEuphoria files

• Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Jul 02, 2005
• 564 views

On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 05:28:42 -0700, Robert Craig
<guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:

>No, I won't be maintaining the 2.4 binder.
>There are several, fairly rare bugs in it that I won't be fixing,
>and there's secret stuff in the source so I can't release it.
Shame, there was definitely something nice about shrouding 
a source and being able to include the shrouded file.

As you said though, few users took advantage of it.

If you ever wake up one morning and realize a way to release
whatever part made it magic [1] and which does not impact on your
commercial goals, (with or without support .... )
If not, so be it, worse things happen at sea.

Or, of course, re-invent the bit I miss in 2.6 )

Regards,
Pete
PS [1] It was never really, in my book anyway, the "secrecy"
thing, simply changing integer OpCode to integer bQ does the job
PPS Lest anyone think otherwise, I consider Rob made the right 
decision re bind/shroud, even though it may have kicked me 
harder than anyone else, but heck, I can stay with 2.4, for the 
things that I think still need it.