Re: Bach 2.2

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

This is the 2.4 source licience agreement!

Though it does point out that you cannot use it to bind executables. or
C/C++ progs.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guillermo Bonvehi" <knixeur at speedy.com.ar>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: Bach 2.2


>
>
> Hayden, read http://www.rapideuphoria.com/license.htm
>
> Best Regards,
>     Guillermo Bonvehi
>
> Hayden McKay wrote:
>
> >
> >The forum cannot be accessed! The attached page is what we are getting.
> >
> >Dont you think you are directly breaching the Euphoria copyright.
> >Personaly
> >I think that Bach is a derived works of Euphoria. And believe that all
> >bach
> >works legaly belong to the Euphoria copyright.
> >
> >If I was the the owner of Euphoria, I would have sent you a solistors
> >letter
> >asking you who your copyright is. And to hand over any bach works. Then
> >siezing your bank accounts. Then I would sit down with the copyright book
> >and write a list of about 30 things to start sueing you for.
> >
> >I dont beleive that you can publish Bach unless you own copyright to
> >Euphoia.
> >(That means, Your copyright trades directly under the copyright of
> >Euphoria.)
> >
> >
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
> -- 
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 13/02/04
>


---



--

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu