Re: Bach 2.2
- Posted by "Hayden McKay" <hmck1 at dodo.com.au> Feb 17, 2004
- 712 views
This is the 2.4 source licience agreement! Though it does point out that you cannot use it to bind executables. or C/C++ progs. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guillermo Bonvehi" <knixeur at speedy.com.ar> To: <EUforum at topica.com> Subject: Re: Bach 2.2 > > > Hayden, read http://www.rapideuphoria.com/license.htm > > Best Regards, > Guillermo Bonvehi > > Hayden McKay wrote: > > > > >The forum cannot be accessed! The attached page is what we are getting. > > > >Dont you think you are directly breaching the Euphoria copyright. > >Personaly > >I think that Bach is a derived works of Euphoria. And believe that all > >bach > >works legaly belong to the Euphoria copyright. > > > >If I was the the owner of Euphoria, I would have sent you a solistors > >letter > >asking you who your copyright is. And to hand over any bach works. Then > >siezing your bank accounts. Then I would sit down with the copyright book > >and write a list of about 30 things to start sueing you for. > > > >I dont beleive that you can publish Bach unless you own copyright to > >Euphoia. > >(That means, Your copyright trades directly under the copyright of > >Euphoria.) > > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > > > -- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 13/02/04 > --- --