Re: Release IDE version 0.18.6m
The origional bug I found when user selects 'run' when viewing layer1, and
controls in layer0 where producing 'not declared' errors.
eg: In the bug.prj I posted I was expecting to get a
"If isVisible(Group2) then
Group2 has not been declared" error.
When selected run while viewing layer1.
I believe that this has something to do with the same bug we found below.
I dont know much about the IDE structure, but here is a posible fix that
would not require a huge operation to fix it.
Maybee when a user selects 'run' when viewing 'layer1' in the frame, IDE can
default the frame view back to 'layer0' (as if the user clicked the 'layer0'
tab) before produceing the exw. You could even do this silently so the frame
would still have layer1 in the view, but IDE would act like user is viewing
layer0. Then after exw is generated, IDE could return to its previouse state
and lauch the exw as normal.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Judith Evans" <camping at txcyber.com>
To: "Eu Forum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: Release IDE version 0.18.6m
>
>
> Yes, I see the problem you described now. Thanks for the project file.
This
> bug is odd since IDE doesn't store the layers any differently than if you
> had not used layering. There is something wrong when the exw is generated,
> however, because it does not assign Group2 as parent of EditText2 and
> MleText4 when layer 1 is active and I do not see the bug right off the
bat.
> When I find the problem I will post back to Topica and probably release a
> patch.
>
> Reporting this bug does not make you a fuss pot and I am sorry if I made
you
> feel that way! I certainly want IDE bug free. Sometimes I just do not
> understand what the problem is and it takes an example to clarify for me.
> ~judith
>
> Hayden McKay wrote:
> I'm running Win98SE 4.10.2222.A
> Euphoria 2.4
> Win32lib 0.59.1 8/June/2003
>
> I tried to produce the same errors I was getting before but failed,
> I encounted the problem when I made the origional version of Encryption
> Utility found in the archives.
>
> I have since removed the layers in the updated version and have completly
> remodled it (using a new *.prj).
>
> If anyone has an old copy of it U may be able to parse it to a *.prj file
> and test with that. It was that origional *.prj that produced the errors I
> mentioned below.
> It is also the only layerd prog that I have experimented with sofar.
>
> HOWEVER, I did find something else while trying to get back to the same
> errors.
>
> If I launch the attatched file from layer0, Everything works fine.
> If I launch it from layer1 then the 'setVisible()' statements seem to
> misbehave.
>
> When launched from layer0, on the GotoLayer2 button, Group2 and everything
> in it is made invisible
> with one call to setVisible(Group2,False)
>
> When lanched from layer1 the same call makes Group2 invisible but
everything
> in it remains visible.
>
> Not a big problem, I dont mean to be a fuss pot!
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
> --
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 6/02/04
>
---
--
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
