Re: OT: How far we have come
Kat wrote:
> > Nope, not jesting. I see no point in pursuing Ai further. Expert systems
> > might
> > have a commercial success, but not much beyond second-guessing humans, and
> > not
> > really believed in any subject when it comes to the bottom line. Answering
> > questions is just data retrieval, and is a much smaller problem area. But
> > still,
> > if the predominate questions people pose are the lowest common denominators:
> > porn, evangelistic religions, and xenophobic tribalism,,, then why would
> > they
> > listen to a computer for anything important?
>
Okay, I'll bite.
Why did you lump "evangelistic religions" in the same "lowest common
denominator" category as porn?
Jonas
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
