Re: OT: How far we have come
On 2 May 2004, at 21:34, Kat wrote:
>
>
> On 2 May 2004, at 20:58, Mike Sabal wrote:
>
> >
> > Not interested !?! Surely you jest!
>
> Nope, not jesting. I see no point in pursuing Ai further. Expert systems might
> have a commercial success, but not much beyond second-guessing humans, and not
> really believed in any subject when it comes to the bottom line. Answering
> questions is just data retrieval, and is a much smaller problem area. But
> still,
> if the predominate questions people pose are the lowest common denominators:
> porn, evangelistic religions, and xenophobic tribalism,,, then why would they
> listen to a computer for anything important?
It's been a while, and no one has a comeback.. no feedback? I'm correct, no
questions asked? WOW!
Now if only i could get "goto" added to Eu!
Kat
> Kat
>
>
> > >>> gertie at visionsix.com 05/02/04 7:13 PM >>>
> > Since i have deleted most of Tiggr's Ai code, because no one is
> > interested,=
> >
> >
>
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
