Re: OT: How far we have come
- Posted by Rolf Schroeder <rolf at rschr.de> May 02, 2004
- 429 views
It depends how far prepared the input for a machine has to be. The best would be one could simply speak to the machine like to a more or less intelligent human beeing. I like to solve this without any machine: Let C and P be the number of chickens and pigs. The sum of legs will be: 2*C + 4*P = 100 . The number of C is 3*P, C = 3*P, or: C - 3*P = 0 . This may be written as a matrix equation: | 2 4 | | C | | 100 | | | * | | = | | | 1 -3 | | P | | 0 | . By multiplying this from left with the inverse matrix it follows: | C | | 3 4 | | 100 | | 30 | | | = 0.1*| | * | | = | | | P | | 1 -2 | | 0 | | 10 | , so we find 30 chickens and 10 pigs. This is only one way to solve it. Do you need a machine to invert the matrix? Have a nice day, Rolf irv mullins wrote: On 1 May 2004, at 8:28, irv mullins wrote: Looking thru some old magazine clippings, I found this ad (circa 1982) -- 8080 & Z 80 Users Natural Language is here! Can your computer read and solve this problem by itself? "On their vacation, Tom and Dick visited a farm. While there, they noticed a pen containing chickens and pigs. Tom said there were 3 times as many chickens as pigs. Dick said he counted 100 legs in the pen. How many chickens were in the pen?" With NLOS/1, it can! NLOS/1 is a cassette-based system requiring a minimum of 12k, a serial I/O board and any cassette interface. The system comes with a fully documented seet of assembly language source listings. The cost is only $200. Stop programming your computer, educate it! Order today! CYBERMATE Nazareth, PA -- Assuming this was not an outright scam (with the answer to this one question pre-programmed) do you think that could have been done in < 12k bytes 20 years ago? Or, for that matter, can it be done in 2004? No. In 2004, everyone is going it alone. I know of several people duplicating work in did in the early 90's, rather than work with me. Hi! I'm 47 years old. Besides, they figure by being the first, they can have all the riches of making an Ai all to themselves. Humans don't listen to each other, what makes you think they will listen to a machine? Kat