OpenEuphoria

RE: About XPMmer

• Posted by Andy Drummond <andy at kestreltele.com> Apr 13, 2006
• 542 views

Igor Kachan wrote:
> 
> 
> posted by: Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru>
> 
> Andy Drummond wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > Thanks, Igor, for your samples. I will make the transparent color show 
> > up in the grid by writing a dot in the middle - that OK?
> 
> OK, why not? I just thought those squares are similar, say, to the holes
> of a strainer (sieve) - a hole has no its own color, it is the most
> transparent obiect at all. But dot is good too.
>  
> > I know what you  mean about it being hard to represent a transparent
> > color. I am trying to think of a better way, but first I want to remove
> > those nasty bugs that creep in when you're in a hurry!
> 
> The bugs are immortal, be sure. Don't worry, be happy!
> 
> > Anyway, let's see how the next release pans out - and I "look forward" 
> > to your helpful comments!!
> 
> Ok, I have tried the 2.1 version, looks very well, just needs some
> polish - the transparent pixels must be *with dot* or *without dot*
> anywheres, but now, for example, if you right click dot-pixel, then
> on left click, you'll get pixels without dot. Yes, you can reset then
> the whole dot-option, but it is not that handy, I think.
> I do not think that someone may need two simultaneous representations
> of transparent color on a current picture. So *with or without*,
> but not *with and without*.
> 
> That's all, for now.
> 
> Good Luck!
> 
> Regards,
> Igor Kachan
> kinz at peterlink.ru

I didn't try that!! I quite agree wih you, I tried all sorts of things
but not adding new Transparent pixels after I set the dots. Oh well,
RDS, Issue 2.2 will be along later today!!!
Andy