RE: Confirmation for 2.3

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

aku at inbox.as wrote:
> Will these be avaliable in 2.3 ?
> 
> 1. ^ for power and % for remainder
good idea

> 2. object x = 123
excellent idea. i'd love to see this implemented. too bad it won't be :P

> 3. without line length limit
i'm pretty sure the line length limit is due to internal restrictions

> 4. linked lists
...what?...okay, i don't know what that is :)

> 5. string = "abc" "def" becomes string = "abcdef"
why would we need that?

> 6. "\000\001a" (for example) equals to {0,1,'a'}
why would we need that either?

> 7. native get_bytes(), not concenating the strings
huh?

> 8. getenv renamed to get_env
WHY??

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu