RE: Confirmation for 2.3
- Posted by sephiroth _ <euman2376 at yahoo.com> Aug 16, 2001
- 388 views
aku at inbox.as wrote: > Will these be avaliable in 2.3 ? > > 1. ^ for power and % for remainder good idea > 2. object x = 123 excellent idea. i'd love to see this implemented. too bad it won't be :P > 3. without line length limit i'm pretty sure the line length limit is due to internal restrictions > 4. linked lists ...what?...okay, i don't know what that is :) > 5. string = "abc" "def" becomes string = "abcdef" why would we need that? > 6. "\000\001a" (for example) equals to {0,1,'a'} why would we need that either? > 7. native get_bytes(), not concenating the strings huh? > 8. getenv renamed to get_env WHY??