RE: Anyone want to code a useful utility and get some EuBucks?
- Posted by "SR.Williamson" <writeneu at hotmail.com> Jun 13, 2002
- 419 views
Guess I'm an idiot. I just downloaded it. Nobody uses it (not even me, that's why I had to download it), because it's got at least 2 bugs in it. Plus, it already writes the variables to a file, unless I screwed that up also. SR.Williamson wrote: > Here's what I had in mind. > > A little include that sets up the db/file/etc to hide the details for > newbies, and me. > > A function/procedure in the include that allows you to call it and send > it a variable name. Whenever you have a variable that needs to be > written, you call, for example (pseudocode) > /start > debugger(myVaribleName, myvariable, variableLocation) > /end > > and it writes the state to a file. > > Heck, I think most of the work is already done even. I submitted > something called trackvar to Rob ages ago, which was a > lazy/sloppy/amateurish (like all my programs) attempt to get a Win32 > watch window in Eu. Probably could easily be modified to write the > results. Which I probably should do. I have no idea how to use eds > though, so I guess that's not the way I'll do it. > > Kat wrote: > > On 13 Jun 2002, at 11:59, SR.Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > I didn't realize that long sequences are truncated until Bernie > > > mentioned it. I normally don't use long sequences. > > > > > > By strange coincidence, on this project, I do use them, and yep, they > > > are truncated. I had planned to use ex.err as a debugging tool, but > it's > > > > > > pretty useless now. > > > > > > Anyone up for coding a debug include file that will write a list of > > > variables and sequences to an eds database? > > > > You can't write a general include to list all the vars used up until > > then, for two > > reasons. > > > > 1) you can't point a crash routine at it, so it will not have the > > correct state of > > the vars at crash time. Many people have asked for this ability. > > 2) you can't know the names and state of vars unless explicitly coded > > into > > the include at run time. I have asked for this repeatedly, it would be a > > step up > > from mirc. > > > > Kat > > > > > >