OpenEuphoria

RE: A Euphoria DLL?

• Posted by jordah ferguson <jorfergie03 at yahoo.com> Mar 01, 2002
• 523 views

Jonas, is right, why do we have to rely on another language to compile 
or make dlls. i mean the process is long and tiring why can't we just 
simply use euphoria, this brings us back to what chris recently 
said"Euphoria has the potential to be the best language but.....not lots 
is being done to it". Sorry rob but i agree with chris on that one

Jonas  Temple wrote:
> Andy,
> 
> It doesn't make sense in that I really don't want to have to fight with 
> a C compiler to get my Euphoria code into a .dll.  I certainly could do 
> that (I have Borland C++ 5.something floating around on my hard drive 
> somewhere) but it would be nice to not have to use the compiler.
> 
> Jonas
> Andy Serpa wrote:
> > 
> > Jonas  Temple wrote:
> > > Since everyone has been talking about wish lists for V2.4, I thought I 
> > > would throw my 2 cents in.
> > > 
> > > What I would like to see is the ability to create a .dll with the 
> > > binder.  I know that I can get the translator and then compile to make a 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > .dll but that doesn't make any sense to me.
> > > 
> > 
> > Can you elaborate on just what doesn't make sense to you?  Do you mean 
> > that literally, or you just don't want to do it that way for some 
> > reason?
> > 
> >