Re: cdecl support

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Karl Bochert writes:
> 2) Different Name Mangling:
>   Doesn't Euphoria already depend on the programmer
>   using the decorated name?
>
> 3) Different double return location:
>   Give 2) above, doesn't the C function name
>   describe the calling convention?

Unfortunately, there is no consistency.
You don't have to have "@n" in the name for it
to be _stdcall. Just look at all the Windows API routines.

My notes were taken from one particular C compiler,
and all C compilers have a way for the programmer to
change the function name to anything he likes.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu