RE: cdecl support

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Robert Craig wrote:
> Brian Broker writes:
> > For Robert Craig:  How long before a 2.4 alpha with cdecl support?
> 
> I don't know. It depends on how long it takes to accumulate
> enough bug fixes and new features to justify the (considerable)
> overhead of doing a release. It could be 3 months to a year I suppose.
> 
> > For anybody with source:  Anybody willing to build 
> > me a PD interpreter with cdecl support?  I'm getting 
> > frustrated without it.
> 
> A quick hack could be easily done by someone with the source
> to create a second form of c_proc() and c_func() that would
> use a cdecl call. I don't have time to do quick hacks for one person
> or a few people. I'd like to find the best long-term solution.
> 
> 
How would the long-term solution be different from this "quick hack" -- 
isn't that all we need?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu