OpenEuphoria

RE: No used variable warnings?

• Posted by Brian Broker <bkb at cnw.com> Feb 25, 2002
• 434 views

I had also tried that with no effect.  I believe that the scope on 
with/without is similar to constants/variables/routines.  If an include 
file contains "without warning" then I won't get warnings for only that 
include file.  But it's my main program that I'm dealing with and I have 
no "without warning" and adding "with warning" (even after my includes) 
doesn't change anything.

-- Brian


Chris wrote:
> I'm guessing you have included files in you app. One of them declares 
> without warning (what's the scope on "with/without"?)
> 
> Try adding "with warning" to your main module after your "include" 
> declarations.
> 
> Chris
> 
> Brian Broker wrote:
> > What determines whether unused variables will generate a warning upon 
> > closing a program?  I am modifying this program that has many unused 
> > variables that I want to clean up but I wanted the interpreter to list 
> > them all for me so that I don't clean up the ones I really need.  But I 
> > get no warnings at all when my progam exits.  I even declared some bogus 
> > 
> > 
> > variables that I know aren't used but still no warnings.
> > 
> > I also wrote a simple test program with some unused variables and they 
> > do get reported...
> > 
> > I am using version 2.2 and I am not using "without warning".
> > 
> > Is there a way to force unused variable reporting?
> > 
> > -- Brian
> > 
> >