RE: Python games. was RE: Version 2.4 and beyond

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Ray Smith wrote:

> > It's probably the same in Python, but EUPHORIA is FASTER, isn't
> > it, so, therefore, your EUPHORIA games would operate faster
> > than your Python games when each utilizes a C graphics library.
> 
> Except ExoticaX and Allegro are C libraries with Euphoria wrappers.
> Euphoria and Python are identical in this regard, once someone has 
> written a wrapper no one else needs to write C code.  Just plain
> Euphoria and Python using the wrappers.

That's what I said, so I emphasized the contrast: EUPHORIA is faster 
than Python, so, all things being equal (each using a C graphics 
library), EUPHORIA would be the faster one.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu