RE: stdcall / cdecl -- please clarify
- Posted by Andy Serpa <renegade at earthling.net> Feb 13, 2002
- 604 views
Robert Craig wrote: > Andy Serpa writes: > > Hmmm... that means that even though the interpreter "luckily" can handle > > > > these things, it means we are on shaky ground for a number of powerful C > > > > libraries: > > In the next release, there will be a solution to this. > Ideally, Euphoria would somehow figure out if a __cdecl call > is required, but if that's not feasible, the Euphoria programmer > will be given some means to specify which C routines need > __cdecl. Or, perhaps Matthew Lewis will come up with a clever solution. > > Cool. Glad to hear it. Having the programmer (me) simply specify the calling convention is good enough, but auto-detecting would be nice too (maybe it could detect *other* calling conventions too -- fastcall, etc. and generate an error if it ain't going to work)...