OpenEuphoria

Re: [WIN] drive space used != total file space used; whynot?

• Posted by Dan Moyer <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> Feb 10, 2002
• 463 views

Pete,

Yeah, that's the right order of magnitude of the discrepancy.  Dunno if FAT
table would be that big, maybe.  I think Bernie might have it with the
"swap" file idea.  Plus maybe file & directory filenames making some
difference too, as Kat suggested.

I'll probably just ignore the discrepancy.

Dan


----- Original Message -----
From: <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: [WIN] drive space used != total file space used; whynot?




On Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:53:33 -0800, you wrote:

>the "properties" says there's more space used up on the drive than the
>summing of the directories says.

I just did a quick test on my D: drive and found it was out by
3,774,501 bytes. (Taking into account files in the root directory and
all hidden files  If that figure looks familiar maybe it's a FAT
table or something...

Pete