Re: [WIN] drive space used != total file space used; whynot?
- Posted by Dan Moyer <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> Feb 09, 2002
- 442 views
Vern, Ok, I understood the difference between what the size of an individual file is and the amount of space taken up on a drive by that file due to unit cluster size, and have accommodated that clumsily (still haven't found a way to programmatically discern cluster size); I was using the "properties" comparison originally to see if my code was correctly handling cluster size increments and summing individual directories size used correctly, so I thought to do the same for the drive as a whole, but I'll probably take your advice and ignore it. Thanks. Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: <vern at lvp.eastlink.ca> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [WIN] drive space used != total file space used; whynot? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Moyer" <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> > To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 8:53 PM > Subject: Re: [WIN] drive space used != total file space used; whynot? > > > lesson that you cannot believe everything you see, another is, reality is a > matter of perspective....both apply to how Windows properties "sees" disk > comsumption. Windows XP, for instance, shows a 151 byte file located on > drive c:\ in two ways when I view it in properties. 1). it says the file > is 151bytes in size ( .151K) 2). it also states that this one file is > taking up 4096 bytes (4K) of drive space. Is Windows insane and doesn't > know what it is saying? No, both are true becuase the cluster size is 4K > and the whole cluster is flagged as used. Should for some reason Defrag > (or some other wonderful optimization utility) not have been run for awhile > these unused portions of clusters add up and Windows Properties can wreak > havoc on the senses. My suggestion would be to ignore windows properties > and go with a non-comparitive approach. > > > > Euman, > > > > Thanks, but that's not what I need. I'm not looking for FREE space on a > > drive, I'm trying to display the space USED by all directories on a drive. > > I'm getting that ok (verified afterward by using "properties" on each > > directory & comparing), but when I SUM UP all the space used by all > > directories (& also all files on the drive which are not in directories), > > and compare that to what I see when I use "properties" on the DRIVE > itself, > > the "properties" says there's more space used up on the drive than the > > summing of the directories says. > > > > So I'm wondering what I'm missing. > > > > Anybody got any idea what might be going on? > > > > Dan > >