Re: goto...
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net
Feb 08, 2002
From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET>
> On 9 Feb 2002, at 0:48, Robert Craig wrote:
>
> >
> > Euler German writes:
> > > Though I'd love to here a word or two from Rob.
> > > Hello Rob! Your time now!
> >
> > I've stated many times in the past that I am
> > firmly opposed to adding a goto statement.
> > You'd have to pay me a million dollars.
> > (real U.S. dollars, not 62 cent Canadian dollars)
>
> Since someone with the source code has added goto to the source code, i
> pay should him for Eu from now on?
>
> Kat
I think it a share the wealth sortof thing going on in Robs head.
You have to pay him for Euphoria and pay anyone who develops
extra's into the language.
Im not the Wizard behind the curtain (Rob is) but I think Rob might be
becoming bored (or tired) of having the hassle of all us.
(Just a guess, if your not then sorry Wizard.)
So he (Rob) has devised a method (license) that say's ok you can extend
Euphoria but you cant do certain thing I say, the rest is OK
and you can even sell it to make big bucks.
Then all the questions will lie in the hands of people that
created the extra's and when they're gone from the face of the earth
you'll be stuck with something without support and you'll be back
to asking Rob about "Goto's" or whatever again.
But, still paying the Wizard...
I might be wrong but this is certainly how I see it...
Maybe it's time to crack open some C books, huh?
Meeooww on that a while.... 
Euman
euman at bellsouth.net
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
