Re: The 'goto' debate
On 6 Feb 2002, at 18:21, vern at lvp.eastlink.ca wrote:
>
> I thought the goto statement in TP was for labels only with a specific
> block??
I was questioning the COMEFROM , not the GOTO.
>What do I know, I'll GOTO sleep and mind my business now.
You can't just GOTO bed. First you haveto set up the flow control vars, and
repeatedly test them in that big stacked if-elsif-endif mess in the life
function.
Be sure to verify isinside(cat), islocked(door), possess(me,bed),
appropriate(me,time(sleep)), and the all important
exists(house,{"roof","walls","floor"}) and not
exists(bedroom,{harmful_animals_list,magma})) and not
exists.*(bed,{garden,list.aircraft}).
Kat
> Vern
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET>
> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:21 PM
> Subject: RE: The 'goto' debate
>
>
> > On 6 Feb 2002, at 5:51, kennethroger at prodigy.net wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > EX can get by with a GOTO, but EXW will need a COMEFROM.
> >
> > A COMEFROM? You mean like to know how one got to that point in the
> > execution? Good idea, i was trying to hack Turbo Pascal to do that at one
> > point. But why not make that possible in both dos and windows, and *nix?
> >
> > Kat
> >
> >
>
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
