Re: ASM.E question for PETE
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 18:57:54 -0500, Bernie Ryan <bwryan at PCOM.NET> wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 17:27:49 -0500, Pete Eberlein <xseal at HARBORSIDE.COM>
>wrote:
>
>>This appears to do what you want. I could probably add all the SETcc
>>instructions to asm.e pretty easily. I finished my last final a half-hour
>>ago, so now I have more time to code in Euphoria. I've started making a
>>LL(1) parser, so you can throw any grammar at it and have it parse a file
>or
>>something. I made it so that each rule in the grammar will attempt to
call
>>a function of the same name, so that it can do stuff with the parsed data.
>>It should be suitable for writing a new asm parser, I hope.
>>
>>--Pete
>
>Thank You Very Much Pete !
>
>Is your LL(1) parser going to be written in Euphoria ?
Yes.
>Maybe you can use it to bootstrap a Euphoria compiler.
My thoughts exactly! 
>Maybe you should think about adding conditionals in asm.e also.
Sure, let my dig out those handy dandy intel manuals... I'll put the updated
asm.e on my site when it's done.
>Thanks again
>
>Bernie
Pete
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
