Re: RDBMS for DOS and Windows
- Posted by Everett Williams <rett at GVTC.COM> Feb 24, 2000
- 459 views
Having several customers that fit this description, I can tell you that misinformation or outmoded information is more likely the culprit than lack of money. Many of the these old "penny pinchers" (and how do you think most of them got wealthy in the first place) paid two to four thousand dollars per machine for their original networks plus more for networking software and even more for custom accounting software...many times up into the hundreds of thousands of dollars for even fairly small setups. Their expectations for the replacement are more of the same. When presented with a proposal for client machines at well under 1k per pop and servers for anywhere from $1000 to 10k or more depending on number of clients, they are usually delighted to move into the modern world, no matter how "tight" they are. Especially when they see the amount of off the shelf software now available that can be trimmed up to their needs with minimal stirring. People time is the most expensive item around and highly optimized code on tiny processors may be wonderful for a Mars mission where such parsimony is enforced by the requirements...but then you see what happens to a lot of Mars missions. A lot of very expensive person hours can be traded in for a faster cpu, more RAM and disk and faster communication. Real slop is inexcusable, but building block code is highly efficient from a Return on Investment viewpoint. Even interpreters and compile and go systems can be justified in such systems:) which leads us back to where we are. We need to be able to easily wrap all the building blocks out there with this superbly "person efficient" coding engine that we all love to "play" with. Easy access to all these items through structures that can easily describe all those interfaces tethered together with namespace improvements to allow more easy modularity of use of external code, along with more flexible and powerful calling conventions enabled by items one and two can make Euphoria into a premiere integrator language on that new, faster, cheaper hardware. Then we can go to the old skinflint and say, I'm going to make you money by leveraging all this inexpensive hardware and software in to an integrated whole that serves your specific needs. Everett L.(Rett) Williams rett at gvtc.com