Re: RDBMS for DOS and Windows

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucius L. Hilley III" <lhilley at CDC.NET>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: RDBMS for DOS and Windows



>     486... 386... Blah...  Not a big deal as far as whether windows will
> run or not.. But.. The memory constraints of 4-8Mb is a big issue here.
> Win95 requires  8Mb of RAM in order to install.
> Win98 requires 16Mb of RAM in order to install.
> I have a 486 at 50Mhz with 8Mb with Win95 installed.  I refuse to run it
> because there simply isn't enough memory to support windows.  Not to
> mention trying to run a single application.

Heh, my K6-2-266 is running windoze, and i thought 32meg would be enough
when i built it, boy was i a fool. It's not as bad as the 586-133 with
12meg, which took minutes to draw a window sometimes, but there could still
be seconds after a click before anything happened. Win95 doesn't even become
heavily useable till you get to 64Meg, and if you don't like lots of memory
swaps to the harddrive, you'd better get 96Meg or more.

> With max systems of 486's with 8Mb of RAM...  He is simply stuck with DOS.
> Only other alternatives are as follows:

You could look at Win3.11 (on MSdos) or DRdos, both have GUI, both can be
TCP/IP'd. Don't ask me *how*, for i don't know.

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu