Re: RDBMS for DOS and Windows
About 0.1 second maximum per record, including munging time, in win95. And
that's without any lookup/index tables too. Eu is fast. I have record tags
and field tags, and i search the appropriate file till the record is
located, then load into a sequence until the next record tag. Then i parse
what was loaded into the sequence for the field(s) i wanted. Despite being
basic brute-force, it's faster than you'd expect, but times will vars some,
depending on what windoze is doing. As an example, doing a lookup that
requires fetching 5 records, munging them, and sending the data back thru
winsocks for display in another app took 0.41 seconds.
Kat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Patterson" <drpatt at TOWEROFHOPE.ORG>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: RDBMS for DOS and Windows
> Excellent. That is the kind of info I need! Thank you. May I ask how long
it
> takes your program to find a particular record from that 50MB file in a
> search? My application won't do much retrieval -- mostly just writing new
> records, but occasionally I will need to retrieve.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kat <gertie at ZEBRA.NET>
> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 11:51 PM
> Subject: Re: RDBMS for DOS and Windows
>
>
> >
> > Like i said earlier, i am accessing a custom database of 50Meg, with
> random
> > access, random record length, random field lengths, human readable
(altho
> it
> > need not be) with Eu.
> >
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
