my $.02

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0047_01C10003.615BE9C0
	charset="iso-8859-1"


I have to throw mine in too...

    I have to say that I disagree that a namespace fix should be added =
to the interpreter. If any change is made, I (personally) think it =
should be in the way the Euphoria community "works together", if there =
is such a thing in this day and age.

*dumb suggestion ahead*

    What if, to help reduce the number of namespace conflicts, there =
were a set of includes that could be downloaded as an alternative to the =
standard set, in whole or in part. With some patience and time, I =
believe that such a set could grow into a very useful set of libraries =
if additions were made carefully.

*end dumb suggestion*

    If the "euphoria community" began to work together in such a =
venture, it would not break any code. As a matter of fact, I think any =
libraries added to the set would naturally have to have a minimal number =
of globals declared, just to be compatable with current/future additions =
or versions, thus reducing the number of namespace conflicts anyway.
    This one-minded approach would be much more friendly to newbies, who =
would not really have to worry about what's compatable with what (as =
long as it's from the set), or what do they need to modify, leaving them =
to worry more about what they want to make with it.

    I guess the point of all this is; if everyone uses a "base-set" of =
libraries, or files *from* the base set, and then builds on it as =
required by their program, we wouldn't have to worry as much about how =
to solve the namespace problem, only about how to add to what we have to =
make it all better.

    Just my 2-cents,
        Jason


------=_NextPart_000_0047_01C10003.615BE9C0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have to throw mine in =
too...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I have to say that I =
disagree=20
that a namespace fix should be added to the interpreter. If any change =
is made,=20
I (personally) think it should be in the way the Euphoria community =
"works=20
together", if there is such a thing in this day and age.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>*dumb suggestion ahead*</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What if, to help =
reduce the=20
number of namespace conflicts, there were a set of includes that could =
be=20
downloaded as an alternative to the standard set, in whole or in part. =
With some=20
patience and time, I believe that such a set could grow into a very =
useful set=20
of libraries if additions were made carefully.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>*end dumb=20
suggestion*</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If the "euphoria =
community"=20
began to work together in such a venture, it would not break any code. =
As a=20
matter of fact, I think any libraries added to the set would naturally =
have to=20
have a minimal number of globals declared, just to be compatable with=20
current/future additions or versions, thus reducing the number of =
namespace=20
conflicts anyway.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This one-minded =
approach would=20
be much more friendly to newbies, who would not really have to worry =
about=20
what's compatable with what (as long as it's from the set), or what do =
they need=20
to modify, leaving them to worry more about what they want to make with=20
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I guess the point of =
all this=20
is; if everyone uses a "base-set" of libraries, or files *from* the base =
set,=20
and then builds on it as required by their program, we wouldn't have to =
worry as=20
much about how to solve the namespace problem, only about how to add to =
what we=20
have to make it all better.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Just my =
2-cents,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
Jason</FONT></DIV>

------=_NextPart_000_0047_01C10003.615BE9C0--

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu