Re: Routine_ID Is No Doubt My Solution...
On Sunday 13 April 2003 10:23 am, Derek wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com>
>
> > I still have yet
> > to find something lacking in EUPHORIA, or something I
> > consider to be a detriment to programmers.
>
> Horses for Courses.
What in all of creation does that mean? I could Google it, but it's close to
bedtime.
> I have a host of coding paradigms that I enjoy using,
> (because they increase *my* efficiency) that I have to use workarounds for
> when coding in Euphoria. In other words, using Euphoria, I'm not as
> efficient as I know I could be. I'm just lucky that that is still better
> than using C/C++.
Here's how I see it: you are as efficient as you can be in EUPHORIA. So far,
that's good enough.
> I do most of my commercial coding in VB. I organise my code so I can find
> related routines quickly.
You have that luxury... I have to, often, spew out massive amounts of code in
a day or less. It can be fun!
> Also, the IDE (and the MZTools add-in) makes
> finding routines so simple. The key is, that routines are physically
> organised according to their relationships to each other, rather than their
> physical location in the source file, which can lead to totally unrelated
> routines having to be located next to each other.
My main base of code is like this... I've put all the related functions/subs
together in groups. It does make it real nice!
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
