RE: Namespace Proposal

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

I'am in full agreement with IRV to use the prefix notation.
I don't want the with/without stuff too much typing and confusion.
I just want to be able to include a file and assign it the namespace
of my choosing and use that namespace as a prefix to its routines.
This is the cleanest approach that is used in other langauges.
What everyone has to keep in mine is that Rob has to be able to parse
the code easily without breaking the old code. Anyone that has written
any large program knows how hard it is to keep the names unique
without conflicting with someone elses include files.
I also want to see FORWARD references without the routine_id baloney.
Bernie

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu