OpenEuphoria

Re: SafePeek ?

• Posted by rforno at tutopia.com Jun 08, 2001
• 393 views

Pampeano: I haven't received your message, too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Parnell" <ddparnell at bigpond.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: RE: SafePeek ?


>
>
> Hey, I didn't get them. I certainly have NOT knowingly ignored anyone.
Also,
> my work requires me to travel from time-to-time so some replies are
delayed.
>
> -----------
> cheers,
> Derek Parnell
> Senior Design Engineer
> Global Technology Australasia Ltd
> dparnell at glotec.com.au
>
> ---------------------
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pampeano at ROCKETMAIL.COM [mailto:pampeano at ROCKETMAIL.COM]
> > Sent: Friday, 8 June 2001 11:54 AM
> > To: EUforum
> > Subject: Re: SafePeek ?
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> > Just rename tk_mem_full.e to tk_mem.e, I already reported
> > this one, but
> > Derek seems to have ignored my latest two mails, where I also reported
> > other anomalities.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >   Guillermo Bonvehm
> >
> > --- Irv Mullins <irvm at ellijay.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I just downloaded Win32Lib 56 Alpha.
> > > No program will run, claiming that 'SafePeek' is not defined.
> > > Where is that routine supposed to be? I have safe.e - it's
> > not there.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Irv
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>