OpenEuphoria

Re: more powerful than c++(...able to leap over tall buildings with a ..)

• Posted by gertie at visionsix.com Apr 03, 2003
• 353 views

On 2 Apr 2003, at 23:32, dubetyrant at hotmail.com wrote:

> 
> 
> Kat said:
> "If the keywords in the interpreted language are also replaced with the 
> equivalent inline pre-compiled code, or at least a jmp to such code, the 
> interpreter will be faster than 1/2 as fast as the compiled code."
> 
> -how do you mean? how can you do that? so without doing that the interpreter
> isn't even half as fast? or am I not getting it? thx

It can be at least ( more than ) 1/2 as fast as the compiled program. 

0 - as fast as we'd like
1 - well designed compiled
2 - possibly this fast
3 - possibly this fast
4 - possibly this fast
5 - possibly this fast
6 - possibly this fast
7 - not so well designed compiled or interpreted
8 - not so well designed compiled or interpreted
9 - not so well designed compiled or interpreted
10 - not so well designed compiled or interpreted

Kat