Re: Jarod lib update
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> Sep 28, 2000
- 552 views
Hello mic >>"maybe" = it ran but the sound didn't play > >The DOS version is mute. This is stated in the ReadMe. Oops, guess I didn't read THAT file. >>Sometimes "No" in DOS, means it ran but never did anything >>but never had an error. > >Hmm.. Dunno about this. Some of the programs (mainly bitmap.ex(w) and >tunnel.ex(w) will do a lot of thinking before they display anything). >What kinda computer do you have ? I ran them on this compac computer at college. I don't know the speed but it is pretty fast with 64 Mb Ram. >>I wonder though, can programs written with JAROD be bound? If >>it uses the common dynamic include technique, they can't. > >Do you mean bound as in "bind proggy" or as in "ec(w) proggy" ? Bound with bind.bat. The reason I asked is because I know you do some cross-platform stuff so I was wondering if that required a call-back and routine_id stuff. I know Windows does and that routine_id doesn't work with bind for some reason. And since it doesn't require ANY code modification to get a program to run on a different platform that you might be doing some of that wierd dynamic inclusion stuff which also doesn't get along with bind the last I knew. Just wondering.. later, Lewis Townsend _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.