OpenEuphoria

Re: more powerful than c++(...able to leap over tall buildings with a ..)

• Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Apr 03, 2003
• 445 views

On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 21:08:51 -0500, <dubetyrant at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> So c++ must be as fast as c because it is compiled? Does that mean any 
> compiled language would be faster than the fastest interpreted?(euphoria) 
> ;}
>

What? I was talking about the amount of time it takes to DELIVER a product, 
not the amount of time it takes for that product to EXECUTE.

It is claimed by some that it is faster to CODE in Euphoria than C++, for 
the same result. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the speed of the 
executing program - just how fast it took to write the program.

[snip]

I repeat what I said earlier.
>>
>> I suspect it comes from the idea that, given a programming project that 
>> started from scratch (ie. no-code reuse from other projects), one could 
>> achieve delivery of the product faster with Euphoria than with C++, and 
>> with fewer bugs.
>>

-- 

cheers,
Derek Parnell