Re: more powerful than c++(...able to leap over tall buildings with a ..)
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Apr 03, 2003
- 338 views
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 21:08:51 -0500, <dubetyrant at hotmail.com> wrote: > > So c++ must be as fast as c because it is compiled? Does that mean any > compiled language would be faster than the fastest interpreted?(euphoria) > ;} > What? I was talking about the amount of time it takes to DELIVER a product, not the amount of time it takes for that product to EXECUTE. It is claimed by some that it is faster to CODE in Euphoria than C++, for the same result. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the speed of the executing program - just how fast it took to write the program. [snip] I repeat what I said earlier. >> >> I suspect it comes from the idea that, given a programming project that >> started from scratch (ie. no-code reuse from other projects), one could >> achieve delivery of the product faster with Euphoria than with C++, and >> with fewer bugs. >> -- cheers, Derek Parnell