OpenEuphoria

Re: goddamn equasions

• Posted by Dan B Moyer <DANMOYER at PRODIGY.NET> Sep 14, 2000
• 432 views

Skoda,

Just to clear one thing up:

it's not that you need n equations to be able to solve a set of equations
with n variables , it's that you need n INDEPENDENT equations.  Graphical=
ly
that means the equations give n DIFFERENT lines (or curves), all
intersecting at one (or more) common point(s).

x=3D y + 1
2x =3D 2y + 2

are NOT 2 independent equations.

Dan

----- Original Message -----
From: "=A9koda" <tone.skoda at SIOL.NET>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: goddamn equasions


> Al Getz wrote:
>
> > Are you sure there are not any additions such as:
> >   135 =3D a*1000^b + e^(c*(0.2)) + (0.1)^d   ???
>
> No, my original equasion is right.
>
> > Also, still need n equations to solve for n variables in general.
>
> Yes, that's what i know also and so it must be solvable.
>
> Thanks to everybody who helped.
> Matthew Lewis solved it with Excel functions, don't ask me how, cause i=
t's
> nothing clear to me.
> Anybody interseted, he found  this:
>
> a=3D45.27
> b=3D.232
> c=3D1.203
> d=3D.327