Re: append() versus &=

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Jiri Babor writes:

> I am probably too dense, but Robert's reply was not of much help,
> as far as I am concern...

In Lewis Townsend's program I found a big difference
in the timing of the last two (more complicated) tests,
depending on whether I moved the append() loop before
or after the corresponding &= loop. It's complicated, but
I think it has to do with the pattern of dynamic storage allocation.

I didn't find this with your modified version.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu