Re: append() versus &=

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Lewis Townsend writes:
> Who was it that recently said that append() is faster
> than &= ? I have written a benchmark program that
> seems to prove otherwise. Let me know if there is a flaw
> in my program or if I misunderstood or what.

Try your benchmark again, but this time run each
append() loop *after* the corresponding &= loop.
I think you'll be surprised.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu