Re: My Lobbying
irv wrote:
> Only if you can convince Rob to add a function to return the
> (momentary) address of a sequence. As well as some kind of a
> lock function to prevent garbage collection and sequence copying
> from taking place while you work with the structure. Otherwise, it'll
> be gone by the time you're ready to write something there.
I must be missing something here; I can't think of a single reason I'd want
access to Euphoria's raw sequences. There are already a number of routines
available that will allow conversion of Euphoria sequences to and from C
strings, numeric arrays in memory, and so on. I can't imagine that writing
these routines by hand would be more accurate, or significantly faster.
-- David Cuny
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
