RE: Win32Lib: Common Controls revisited

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Derek Parnell wrote:
> Brian Broker wrote:
> > 
> > If it doesn't break anything else, can we get this fix?  I'd really like 
> > to have my programs look right with version 6 common controls.
> 
> The problem is triggered by the use of XP manifests. The way the Win32lib
> works is that it sets the background color to the values built-in to the
> library, whenever Windows asks for the user-defined background color. That
> is to say, Win32lib gives all controls a user-defined color. By default
> this is the colors set by the user in the current Display Appearance Scheme.
> 
> But this only works when there is no manifest in place, or the manifest
> is using the 'classic' scheme. If an alterate manifest is active, Win32lib's
> operation is always replacing whatever the manifest does with the built-in
> colors (though not in ways you'd expect). 
> 
> To 'fix' this, I have to change the internal usage of a number of color
> attributes so that the library only sets the background color for those
> controls that have explicitly been asked by the user app to use a specific
> color. This might also affect text colors too. So more research will 
> need to be done.
> 
> The upshot is that it will take me a few days to get it right!

I guess this is where you've changed the classBGColor values from 
COLOR_WINDOW to w32NoColor?  This causes a problem under Win2KPro with
treeviews.  The tree lines now are dark grey, while the rest of the control
is white.
 
Perhaps the old behavior should be maintained, and a new routine like 
useThemes() could be implemented to change the appropriate backgrounds.
I suppose you could autodetect this for XP.

Matt Lewis

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu