Re: [OT] I think I have a virus
- Posted by irv mullins <irvm at ellijay.com> Aug 18, 2004
- 539 views
Unkmar wrote: > > > > There's an article on Slashdot.org about that right now. > > Essentially, it says that after you format your disk and re-install > > Windows, you have an average of 20 seconds online before you are hit with > > some kind of exploit. Since it takes way longer than 20 seconds to > > get and install all the Microsoft updates which are supposed to protect > you > > from such things, it seems like a lost cause. > > Maybe order SP2 on CD from Microsoft? > > > > Irv > > > > Irv, you get on my nerve > I agree that linux is great > but that don't mean Windows is crap. Where does my post mention Linux? I suggested you order SP2 from Microsoft on a CD, so you don't have to go thru the 250 megs of download while connected to the internet with a vulnerable computer. I do think that whoever thought up the Windows on-line update system didn't account for all the problems it would cause. Just what would be wrong with the world's richest company sending out updated versions of Windows to its customers via mail? If AOL can send us CD's every couple of weeks, what's stopping Microsoft? Surely they know that no one on dialup is going to download the huge SP2 update, leaving millions of unpatched computers still connected to the net. If it was General Motors who issued a potentially faulty product, let's say for example, an ignition switch which would accept any old housekey, they would issue a recall, fix the problem at no charge, and say a polite "thank you". Why is Microsoft any different? > Ever heard of a router and firewall. > That should greatly increase that supposed 20sec time frame. > Besides, I think that is an exaggeration. But what do I know. Even if it was 20 minutes, can you download 250 megs of updates in 20 minutes? > You appear to tell tall tales to sale linux. You appear to troll. > Your view is that Windows is minnow and that linux is > the 120lb Bass. No, Windows is not a fish, even though it sometimes stinks. > Your view is that Windows is only good for discussion > and linux is the only way to go. Windows does create a lot of discussion on the web. Most of it is not very flattering. Why do you suppose that happens? > Your tales state that linux is the white knight in shining > armour and that Windows is the evil lord that deligates > many black knights out to fight. Not at all. Windows is an operating system. If there's any evil involved, it is in Mr. Gates' business tactics. But come to think of it, you may be right. Lawyers do wear black suits. Irv