Re: 32-bit random numbers
Derek Parnell wrote:
> Juergen Luethje wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> Derek, do you think using set_rand() is essential here?
>
> If you are after a pseudo-random generator then it would not be required,
> but if you want truer randomness, then it would be helpful.
>
> Each value returned by rand() is dependent on the previous value,
> the initial seed and how many previous values you have gotten so far.
>
> By inserting set_rand() with values not based on anything that rand()
> returns, you will get more unpredictablity about which value will
> be the next returned by rand(). Without this, you can 100% 'predict'
> the value because it is calulated.
>
> In general use, this is not a big issue, but in areas of gaming, encryption,
> and other high-volume random numbers, it is important.
I see now. Thank you very much for the comprehensive explanation.
Regards,
Juergen
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|