Re: Puzzle challenge:
- Posted by Patrick Barnes <mrtrick at gmail.com> Aug 10, 2004
- 461 views
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:35:55 +0000, Brian Broker <bkb at cnw.com> wrote: > > > Patrick Barnes wrote: > > > > > > > > One. > > > > Drop it from the ground floor and it breaks, that's the top floor from > > > > which the > > > > orbs will survive (worst case). > > > > Alright, from an algorithmic point of view, what's the most number of > > times you'll have to drop something to determine the top survivable > > floor. :oP > > No more loopholes. The balls are resilient, and aren't weakened by > > each drop. Either they break, or they are fine. Um, any other > > loopholes I'll close too. So no thinking outside the box! > > Is determining the terminal velocity of the orb thinking outside of the > box? Because you can limit the search up to the floor from which t.v. > is reached. > > -- Brian > Assume that the balls are dense enough that terminal velocity is much faster than could be attained during a drop, even from a 100,000 storey building. Back in the box *Whip-crack!* back I say...! -- MrTrick