bad euphoria
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01BFAAF4.D353F460
charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i have found the biggest weakness of Euphoria
you cant have large database of functions you can reuse later cause =
every function you call must be before current function!
sure you can call it with call_func(routine_id("name",{params})), but =
that doesnt look good and its complicated. I would like to know if this =
is also slower than normal function calling ??? cause if it isnt than we =
could write and use preprocessor (code would look normal and it would =
save you a lot of work)
and Euphoria could be more flexible in general, but it would loose some =
of its speed then, probably
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01BFAAF4.D353F460
charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-2" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>i have found the biggest weakness of=20
Euphoria</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>you cant have large database of =
functions you can=20
reuse later cause every function you call must be before current=20
function!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>sure you can call it with=20
call_func(routine_id("name",{params})), but that doesnt look good and =
its=20
complicated. I would like to know if this is also slower than normal =
function=20
calling ??? cause if it isnt than we could write and use =
preprocessor=20
(code would look normal and it would save you a lot of =
work)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and Euphoria could be more =
flexible in=20
general, but it would loose some of its speed then,=20
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01BFAAF4.D353F460--
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
