Re: Translator Internals
CChris wrote:
>
> [snipped text]
>
> I'll have to study more how the type and range info is gathered or discarded,
> because a couple things puzzled me in the code. How do the scope of EU
> variables translate in the C output? It looks like there is no longer a
> difference between global, local or private (aprat from the derefencing of
> privates). Is this assessment correct?
From a C perspective they're all basically global. Conflicts are handled
by the file-number prefix that gets added to everything. The code isn't
meant to be maintained or otherwise used, so there's not a real concern
about minimizing globals, or some such. The allowed usages are enforced
by the front end, just like with the interpreter.
Matt
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
