Re: Eu improvements (part 4)
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com> Jan 07, 2007
- 680 views
James W Hofmann wrote: > > Chris Bensler wrote: > > > > Actually, while data structures would be useful too, I don't think that is > > what > > we are actually in need of. What we need is a way to address the global > > pollution > > created by all the index constants used for the pseudo-structures we already > > use routinely. We just need a way to name the elements. > > > > This would bring us back to the first thing I proposed, adding a > keyword "index" used within type to declare named indexes, > and some extra syntax to access a named index. > A simple aliasing scheme, without performance impact after compilation. > <a > href="http://www.listfilter.com/EUforum/m11619.html">http://www.listfilter.com/EUforum/m11619.html</a> That's why I like the idea. Plus regarding other threads on the subject, I don't like the idea of making another datatype that is not a sequence and I understand Rob's objections. However the way that classes are implemented in ooeu fits the bill for what we are suggesting, for the most part. -- "Any programming problem can be solved by adding a level of indirection." --anonymous "Any performance problem can be solved by removing a level of indirection." --M. Haertel "Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming." --C.A.R. Hoare j.