Re: Eu improvements (part 4)
Pete Lomax wrote:
>
> Ray Smith wrote:
> > "If" OO can be added to Euphoria...
> > OO doesn't solve all of the problems in the world ... but it does give the
> > programmer some powerful tools to solve certain problems very elegantly.
> Features, yes, OO, no.
> I firmly believe there are some really great neato features we can add,
> some of which come from the dying throes of the OO movement, as it were.
> But OO has failed, in case you hadn't noticed.
I hadn't heard that OO had failed. In which way do you believe OO has failed?
Maybe you have a different view of success vs failure?
Why are all the most popular and most used languages OO?
When I first started using eu some 9 years ago I was against OO - and loved
Euphoria!
As I have learned more and had more experience I have grown to appreciate OO
concepts and believe it's a great solution to many problems.
Regards,
Ray Smith
http://RaymondSmith.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
