OpenEuphoria

Re: Eu improvements (part 4)

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com> Jan 05, 2007
• 665 views

Karl Bochert wrote:
> Well heres the gauntlet.
> My SS proposal is on the table.
> Yes, No, only with changes, or yes but consider this syntax first?
> 
> The proposal is SS.
> The proposal is NOT dot-notation, NOT named elements,
> NOT namespaced ids, NOT a new syntax for user-defined datatypes.
> It IS a combination of all those things in a coherent package.
> 
> For or Against?
> 
> KtB

Okay, because of your gauntlet I say "no".

My only caveat is the reason people say, "have you seen xyz?" is because that is
our way of saying "yes but consider this syntax first". But since I've given
examples and made discussion I guess that's all I've got.

--
"Any programming problem can be solved by adding a level of indirection."
--anonymous
"Any performance problem can be solved by removing a level of indirection."
--M. Haertel
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare
j.