OpenEuphoria

Re: Eu improvements (part 4)

• Posted by Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at gmail.com> Jan 05, 2007
• 661 views

Karl Bochert wrote:

> 
> I understand that an OOp system can declare member variables.
> But again, I am not proposing OOP  I am proposing SS and PBR.
> 
> If people want OOP then new features such as PBR and SS are not
> necessary - they just start their program with
> }}}
<eucode>
>    include "ooeu.e"  -- (or whatever your library is named)
> </eucode>
{{{


I know what you're saying.  As Jason pointed out, ooeu isn't a 
library (although you can embed it in your program as a scripting 
engine that way).

The main point of ooeu is to have a place to really try out some of the
ideas that get thrown around here over the years.  However, the way I've
implemented OOP is very similar to your concept of SS, and gives people
a way to play with this sort of thing in a working interpreter (I've 
gotten the translator to work with many ooeu features, too, BTW).

Matt