OpenEuphoria

Re: Eu improvements (part 4)

• Posted by c.k.lester <euphoric at cklester.com> Jan 05, 2007
• 668 views

Karl Bochert wrote:
> c.k.lester wrote:
> > I messed up the paradigm... here it is corrected:
> > c.k.lester wrote:
> <snip earlier messages> 
> > newInstance("automobile_database","myCars")
> > so 'myCars' is now a database of automobiles.
> > this really should be
> > auto = newInstance("automobile")
> > or better
> > newInstance("automobile","auto1")
> > which creates a new automobile called auto1.
> > With this paradigm, we have no global constants required.
> > -- modify a property
> > property("auto1","maker","Ford")
> > -- add the auto to the database
> > addObject("myCars","auto1")
> This 'OOP as a mindset for using functions' may work for some, but I find
> it very difficult to read or understand.

I was simply applying my lists functionality to OOP functionality (I thought
you were wanting OOP stuff). It basically has nothing to do with OOP, but can
be used in that way.

> My posts were about 2 features that might make me a Euphorian again:
>   .  Pass By Reference

Don't know why this is needed. Can you give an example where PBR is required?

>   .  Structured Sequences

Yes. Gimme. :)

> not about OOP or ways to implement it.

Sorry, that was just a tangent I thought I was following you on! heh.

> With that in mind, I would ask those who disagree which category
> they place themselves in:
> 1) Good ideas, but flawed implementation
> 2) I don't like PBR
> 3) I don't like SS
> 4) Both are instruments of the devil
> 5) Irrelevant  -- Euphoria is perfect

I'm in the "Euphoria is perfect... and would be even more perfect with
structured sequences!" :D

Adding structured sequences would not break anything, and would give us
a more powerful language syntax but still keep it all simple.

type text(sequence s)
   return is_all_ascii( s )
end type

sequence Company is
   text name
   Address headquarters
   --...
end sequence

sequence automobile is
     Company maker
     text model
     atom year
   --...
end sequence

Although, I still don't like the use of static variable names. For example,
what if we create a huge program with lots of includes and code and has the
automobile.maker text all throughout but we want to change the definition to
Company manufacturer at some point, thus breaking all that code (which now
needs to be automobile.manufacturer)?

Oh, well, this should all be in a database anyway. :)

How about instead of

sequence Company is
   --...
end sequence

we use

record Company
   --...
end record

because that's really what it seems to be: a database record.